Amy erbacher dating
So in my case, I thought, well, will data and an algorithm lead me to my Prince Charming? When I was asked about fun activities and my ideal date, I said monetization and fluency in Japanese. So obviously this was not the best way to put my most sexy foot forward. The algorithm matched us up because we share a love of gadgets, we share a love of math and data and '80s music, and so I agreed to go out with him. And we went in, and right off the bat, our conversation really wasn't taking flight, but he was ordering a lot of food. I'm going to shove it into my bag, I'm going to have this email template, and I'm going to fill it out and collect information on all these different data points during the date to prove to everybody that empirically, these dates really are terrible.
But the real failure was that there were plenty of men for me to date. In fact, he didn't even bother looking at the menu. Well, it turns out that these probably weren't bad guys. And as it happens, the algorithms that were setting us up, they weren't bad either.
I was looking for somebody who was Jewish, because I am and that was important to me. I figure I'm attracted to maybe one out of 10 of those men, and there was no way I was going to deal with somebody who was an avid golfer.
I also wanted somebody who not only wanted two children, but was going to have the same attitude toward parenting that I do, so somebody who was going to be totally okay with forcing our child to start taking piano lessons at age three, and also maybe computer science classes if we could wrangle it.Very few of us have the ability to be totally and brutally honest with ourselves. What was every single possible thing that I could think of that I was looking for in a mate?The other problem is that these websites are asking us questions like, are you a dog person or a cat person? So I started writing and writing and writing, and at the end, I had amassed 72 different data points.One, I can take my grandmother's advice and sort of least-expect my way into maybe bumping into the one out of 35 possible men in the entire 1.5-million-person city of Philadelphia, or I could try online dating.Now, I like the idea of online dating, because it's predicated on an algorithm, and that's really just a simple way of saying I've got a problem, I'm going to use some data, run it through a system and get to a solution.I broke it into a top tier and a second tier of points, and I ranked everything starting at 100 and going all the way down to 91, and listing things like I was looking for somebody who was really smart, who would challenge and stimulate me, and balancing that with a second tier and a second set of points.These things were also important to me but not necessarily deal-breakers.And if I want to start having children by the time I'm 35, that meant that I would have had to have been on my way to marriage five years ago. If my strategy was to least-expect my way into true love, then the variable that I had to deal with was serendipity.In short, I was trying to figure out what's the probability of my finding Mr. Well, at the time I was living in the city of Philadelphia, and it's a big city, and I figured, in this entire place, there are lots of possibilities. Population of Philadelphia: it has 1.5 million people.I didn't carry on crazy Catfish-style relationships with anybody. When I released these men into the wild, I did follow some rules. I just waited to see who these profiles were going to attract, and mainly what I was looking at was two different data sets.So I was looking at qualitative data, so what was the humor, the tone, the voice, the communication style that these women shared in common?